First, JUSTICE NEIL M. GORSUCH is a fabulous addition to the United States Supreme Court as he has already shown on his first day that he promotes following “the plain text of the statute.”
Accordingly, as any reasonable person knows; a divorce judgment is illegal and shows malice if there is not full disclosure of all the assets; their net worth; their 50/50 division; and their 50/50 distribution; plain and simple as stated in “the plain text of the statute;” many statutes and other laws too.
Thus, all of my defendants including many very well educated and experienced judges, law firms and their lawyers, corporations and their executives and other professionals will have a very difficult time explaining to JUSTICE GORSUCH and the other U.S. Supreme Court Justices why they have been refusing for many years now to enforce basic family law statutes and other laws. This includes JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG who is one of my defendants and will have to recuse herself from the bench when my case is heard before the court.
It will be interesting to see how JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG explains her refusal to discuss the epidemic problem of illegally and immorally using Charitable Nonprofits to steal and launder money as the special dinner speaker at a prominent lawyers’ Nonprofit Institution’s upcoming meeting where Charitable Nonprofits is the featured discussion.
IGNORANCE IS NOT A DEFENSE OF THE LAW; but regardless;
Do you think JUSTICE GINSBURG and all my other very educated and experienced defendants will be able to successfully explain to JUSTICE GORSUCH and the other U.S. Supreme Court Justices that THEY JUST DID NOT UNDERSTAND these very fundamental and basic family law statutes and other laws regarding full disclosure and the establishment of the net worth of the community estate, its division and distribution at the time of divorce?
Do you think JUSTICE GINSBURG and all my other very educated and experienced defendants will be able to explain to JUSTICE GORSUCH and the other U.S. Supreme Court Justices that THEY JUST DID NOT UNDERSTAND the net worth of the community estate, its division and distribution at the time of divorce are all LEGALLY REQUIRED FACTORS which must incorporated into a divorce judgment, according to “the plain text of the statute;” otherwise the divorce judgment is illegal and invalid?
In addition, do you think JUSTICE GINSBURG and all my other very educated and experienced defendants will be able to explain that THEY JUST DID NOT UNDERSTAND that before a compassionate, law-abiding Mother can be legally and morally, and not illegally and maliciously, deprived of custody and visitation; she must be proven with many tests and evaluations that she is a danger to her children?
Do you think they will be able to explain to JUDGE GORSUCH and the other U.S. Supreme Court Justices that they did not KNOW OR UNDERSTAND several Constitutional Amendments which protect the sacred companionship between a compassionate, law-abiding Mother and her Children according to “the plain text of the statute.”?
Do you think JUSTICE GINSBURG and all my other very educated and experienced defendants will be able to explain to JUDGE GORSUCH and the other U.S. Supreme Court Justices that their repeated actions over many years have not been malicious?
JUSTICE GORSUCH follows his mentor, the late JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, who insisted that the U.S. Supreme Court should decide cases based upon the words of the law, not how the law has been interpreted by lower courts.
This is music to my ears and should also be to anyone who has been suffering from the TERROR of Parental Alienation and the illegal and immoral use of 501(c)(3) and other Nonprofit Organizations since these acts of terror are explicitly prohibited by “THE PLAIN TEXT OF THE STATUTE;” or also referred to as THE LETTER OF THE LAW.
Further, based upon JUSTICE GORSUCH’S first day, it also appears that he will not be swayed by very well educated and experienced attorney and law firm founder PHILIP G. SEASTROM and others both professionally and personally based upon their personal declarations signed under the penalty of perjury.
They have made many ambiguous claims and also carried out malicious prosecution using the irrelevant anti-SLAPP laws and other malicious legal strategies including but not limited to requesting restraining orders against me, a compassionate, law-abiding Mother, which have no legal or rational basis but show malicious intent.
Second, I am getting closer to bringing these major issues before the United States Supreme Court since I recently filed my Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court. This is the same court which made the very controversial ruling to invalidate PRESIDENT TRUMP’S travel ban.
Thus, if the Ninth Circuit also denies me my legal rights pursuant to the LETTER OF THE LAW regarding my fraudulent and malicious divorce judgment and deprivation of my legal rights as explained above; I will then have the opportunity to appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
If the Ninth Circuit does not deny me my legal rights pursuant to the LETTER OF THE LAW, then I will have obtained Truth and Justice for millions of us suffering from the epidemic problems of Parental Alienation and the illegal and immoral use of 501(c)(3) and other Nonprofit Organizations by setting new legal precedent.
Thus, I am thrilled that I have been able to use my legal education and experiences and the wonderful legal resources in Los Angeles along with the support of some very special people to address these epidemic problems which are destroying our society and humanity.
Truth, Justice and Equal Rights are prevailing more and more each day.
As always, none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experience.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;
www.Palienation.org
