My meeting in the court cafeteria was with Judge Silbar’s court appointed guardian who is also an attorney named Cheryl Walsh and with Judge Silbar’s court-appointed attorney named Brian Baron. As the court transcript reflects, attorney Baron recommended Walsh be appointed as my guardian. He told me that then he would be able to move the case out of Judge Silbar’s court, which was what I wanted. He “neglected” to tell me that first he would need to have Cheryl Walsh declare me incapable and insane; just a minor detail he left out.
However, anyone with half a brain knows that I am quite capable of understanding the law and the facts and do not need a guardian to help me. To claim that I do is a lie, perjury, obstruction of justice, other crimes and a waste of taxpayer money.
So what is attorney and guardian Cheryl Walsh’s truthful purpose? What was the truthful purpose of the meeting in the court cafeteria? I posed this latter question to both attorney Baron and attorney/guardian Walsh in an email but neither one answered me as I completely expected. So what are they hiding this time?
It appears that Walsh was “gathering information” from me and was supposed to negotiate a settlement where I would agree to waive my right to have full disclosure of all the community assets, income, separate property and other property interests as California community property, family, contract and other laws mandate. Well, as you know since I posted this after the meeting, I refused to waive my right to full disclosure and was appalled that Walsh even requested this; especially since supposedly she was there ONLY to address another one of the alleged contempt matters made by my lying, cheating, malicious still legal husband Mark Hassman, who has committed many well-documented criminal acts.
Anyway, if my defendants truly want to negotiate a fair and honest settlement where there is a win/win situation; even if I refuse to shake their hands at the end; then I want it known that I will accept what I know is a reasonable amount of money I should have received at the time of divorce, not even considering the legal penalties for concealing assets, obstructing justice, malicious prosecution and other criminal acts.
THEN I plan to use this money to continue OUR REVOLUTION to END Parental Alienation for future generations and for many today.
Remember, we cannot control what our adult children do and I refuse to welcome ANY criminals in my life, UNLESS they change as I am sure many of you feel the same because this is reasonable.
So, I see the negotiations as a two-step process. First I must receive my money/assets/income from my community estate and then I plan to use it to continue OUR REVOLUTION to END Parental Alienation which will make us Business Reformers and also Social Reformers.
This is what a REVOLUTION is; both business and social reforms so we will make an ENDURING IMPACT in our society and for future generations. We need to focus on people’s and organizations’ moral and ethical beliefs and PROVE that Parental Alienation no longer complies with those beliefs and should be REPLACED with other ones that provide more and better benefits.
Now, since the facts prove that my defendants and those aiding and abetting them have become common criminals who also have a very serious attitude problem; do you think these negotiations can actually occur where there is a win/win situation? ***It’s a great opportunity for them to end their criminal exposure and for me and all of us who promote OUR REVOLUTION to enter the next phase.
***My negotiation strategy is very clear: I want to obtain the money/assets/income I should have received at the time of divorce and thereafter. That’s it. I like to follow the “kiss” method which stands for “keep it simple and sweet.”
What do you think my defendant’s will want? Do you think they will agree with my strategy or have a different position?
In analyzing the past, I think depending on my defendants to help OUR REVOLUTION is a deal breaker. This is why I think this two-step strategy should be more effective.
If you have any suggestions, please post them as a comment on my facebook page because I do not open emails from anyone I do not know as I am sure you can understand.
I am thrilled with all of the facts which have been and continue to be exposed. I plan to file more court documents next week and my others cases are moving forward!!! Go Truth, Justice, Equal Rights and Freedom for all and of course Love and God.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org
Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children)
